“It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled”  – Mark Twain

wtc-7-vs-controlled-demolition wtc-bldg7 wtc7an solomon2


• NIST says – “This building collapsed due to office fires and damage from the collapse of WTC 1&2”?

⇒ It is virtually impossible for a building to collapse symmetrically, uniformly, at a rate of free fall speed without the use of explosives

»» Architect Richard Gage explains Building 7‘s controlled demolition [Video] ««

• People unfamiliar with the issue would say explosives were put in the building by the rescue teams to help ease it down?

⇒ The set up of a controlled demolition would take months of planning and weeks for the actual placement of the explosives – this CANNOT be done in the span of a few hours, let alone in a disaster zone, where there is already local damage and dispersed office fires

»» Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko sees Building 7 collapse – his first reaction [Video] ««

• Officially 7 World Trade Center is the first tall building known to have collapsed primarily due to uncontrolled fire

»» WTC 7 vs. other Skyscrapers on fire – not a scientific proof, still intriguing ««

>>> Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truththe Evidence <<<


One Response to 9/11

  1. […] of Crimes Against Humanity – Sept 11th 2001… was not a terrorist event that led to the death of 3000 people… Sept 11th was a Crime Against […]

FutureTalk »

Documentary Filmmaker Tony Rooke on his movie Incontrovertible »»